Posted by Animesh K on 06/12/07 19:08

Chaddy2222 wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> dorayme wrote:
>>
>>> "M" <nowhereman@twilightzone.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And, finally, for another perspective, there's this site:
>>>> http://www.e-creative.net/enter.asp
>>>>
>>>> I don't know this group, but the sites that have won awards as
>>>> determined by this website suck hugely. Every one of them are fully
>>>> Flash-powered. I'm on high speed and I gave up on most of them
>>>> because I couldn't be bothered waiting.
>>> http://www.e-creative.net/enter.asp itself is very bad indeed.
>> ..and the rest aren't any better. <g>
>>
> Yeah, I could not agree more, mind you I did not bother looking at
> most of them.
> The DTP looking one I thaught was a pile of shit. Considering the
> subject matter, the site did not even have a proper title tag, and
> overall as any person with a clue knows, DTP layouts do not work on
> the web, go to the site http://www.inspireddevices.com and wack the
> font size up a few times. It will break quite easily.

Does not breaks for me in firefox if I increase font two times. I think
that is fair enough. 99% will not increase the font since it is large
enough and 99.99% will not increase the font more than +2 times.

You should give a try before reviewing. And the site looks beautiful. I
haven't checked it on the html/css validator, so cannot comment much
about that.

> The verdonna (or however the hell you spell it) font really is quite
> bloody un-readable at larger font sizes.
> --
> Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
>

[Back to original message]