Reply to Re: photos stored in database or as files

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 06/13/07 15:42

Toby A Inkster wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> Also, see how much space they take. Unless they're
>> each a multiple of 512 bytes, you'll get a lot of wasted space.
>
> Certain filesystems (e.g. ReiserFS and JFS) use block suballocation
> allowing multiple files or part-files to share the same block, which
> makes the storage of many small files very efficient.
>

Toby,

Yes, I understand. But there's still a larger amount of overhead in
those filesystems than there is with a database - even with an index.

Additionally, how many hosting companies are using ReiserFS and/or JFS?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация