Posted by El Kabong on 06/14/07 12:58

"Bergamot" <bergamot@visi.com> wrote in message
news:5dcpd1F31gij7U1@mid.individual.net...
> El Kabong wrote:
>> "Bergamot" <bergamot@visi.com> wrote in message
>> news:5da5nhF3416emU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> I've heard the
>>> good-flash-bad-flash thing before, but still haven't seen good flash in
>>> action. I don't believe it exists, except in theory. :(
>>
>> I like this one: http://www.miccosukee.com
>>
>> Effective use of eye candy,
>
> We weren't discussing flash eye candy, but flash usability and
> accessibility. Got an example of that?
>
> BTW, I was immediately turned off by the rapid-fire animation at that
> site. It's the main reason I keep flash disabled by default.

IMO, the deciding factor determining the use of any technology is purpose.
*In this case*, the use of Flash appears justified by the site's purpose,
thus making it "good flash".

But that's just my opinion. I'm entitled to be wrong if I want to. :-)

El
--
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is
no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof."
Galbraith's Law

[Back to original message]