Posted by dorayme on 07/02/07 00:54

In article
<1183337061.452358.124030@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
windandwaves <nfrancken@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 2, 10:52 am, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article
> > <1183324106.197038.14...@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > windandwaves <nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Folk
> >
> > > Please review my website:www.sunnysideup.co.nz.
> >
> > On Macs with some popular newsreaders, links clicked will not
> > succeed without the http:// prefixed.
>
> Not sure what you mean - is it important?
>

Depends on your point of view. It is nice to click a link and it
opens. When this fails, some of us have to manually add the
http:// bit. Not the end of the world, just thought I would
mention it.


> > Nice clean look of this site, disconcerting to have the
> > thumbnails overlay the text if the browser window is even as wide
> > as 800px.
>
> They dont, ONLY when you resize the window after loading - which is
> pretty rare and then again, the next page will load fine. Just try it.

I often resize windows after they load and only after this inside
info you provide to me do I see that a refresh (no need to go
another page) does it adjust. Neat, of course from a narrow
technical point of view: not sure I have seen this before!

But, imo, you are gambling here too much. There may be many
others who do as I do, resize windows (it is perhaps more common
on Macs?)

Look at the page, why would you go in for such fancy sniffing
with the downside I mention when you could easily em base your
material to adjust in a normal good practice html/css way?

Again, I have not looked at your code (in case I am tempted to
distract myself from work for longer!)

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]