Posted by Blinky the Shark on 07/02/07 18:46

Animesh K wrote:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:48:09 GMT Infant Newbie scribed:
>>
>>> Do you still design to the 800 x 600 ""STANDARD"" ?
>>
>> Sort of. Virtually all my site is thumbnail galleries so I use 800 x 600
>> as the minimum at which they will display esthetically as I wish. I pretty
>> much use 1280 x 1024 as the maximum for this. (I believe the overall
>> median is probably 1024 x 768.)
>>
>> Note that a page must (and does) display correctly at all sizes sans
>> horizontal scrollbar within the limits of a single thumb. What is
>> sometimes overlooked are very large screens; I know some ppl. with 8092 x
>> ???? screens, and a decent page should be rendered sensibly even in those.
>>
> Here is an interesting piece of information from w3counter. The median
> claim you have seems correct. And about 9% people use 800 by 600 px
> resolution. This data is generated on a small subset of websites, however.
>
> Screen Resolutions
> 1 1024x768 50.90%
> 2 1280x1024 16.81%
> 3 800x600 8.93%
> 4 1280x800 8.20%
> 5 1152x864 3.99%
> 6 1440x900 2.77%
> 7 1680x1050 1.85%
> 8 1280x768 1.26%
> 9 1280x960 1.07%
> 10 1400x1050 1.00%
>
> Ref: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?date=2007-05-20

What is the size of these people's browser viewports?


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

[Back to original message]