|
|
Posted by windandwaves on 07/02/07 23:10
On Jul 2, 8:20 pm, Andy Dingley <ding...@codesmiths.com> wrote:
> On 1 Jul, 22:08, windandwaves <nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please review my website: <http://www.sunnysideup.co.nz>
>
> XHTML 1.1 Why?!?
Sorry, I forgot to mention why I used this. Hmmmm, there is no real
reason and I know it does not really makes sense. The only reason is
that I believe, and I am probably wrong, that due to its strict rules,
it is probably a bit more browser compatible then something like "html
loose".
What do you think of the following, slightly different Doctype
definition????
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/
TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" >
Is there any difference adding the xml tag in front?
Sorry, I probably should read up on this.
[Back to original message]
|