|
Posted by dorayme on 07/10/07 02:16
In article
<Xns9968BF434A6C5nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:10:09 GMT
> Blinky the Shark scribed:
>
> >>>> Don't forget, a Grouper is a kind of fish, too. Who knows, this guy
> >>>> could be your second cousin...
> >>>
> >>> A Groper is a beautiful fish that I see all the time down at
> >>> Clovelly when swimming. The male is a magnificent powder blue,
> >>> the female is a sort of muddy green, it is about 3/4 metres long.
> >>> gorgeous things...
> >>
> >> Males are often magnificent with regard to females.
> >
> > But here's what groupers actually look like:
> >
> > http://blinkynet.net/comp/googlegrouper.html
> >
> > (...as linked from the main page shown in my sig.)
>
> That's what I thought! Dorayme said they were "magnificent" (-and watch
> her bitch about the capital "d",) but that looks more like a rather
> flattened version of Jabba the Hutt. From vague memories in the past, I
> believed they were butt-ugly but couldn't picture any.
It was because of your continued failure to understand about this
d business that I did not trust your spelling of "grouper" and
thought it referred to "groper" - (ignoring more obscene thoughts
that you are fond of)
<http://www.amonline.net.au/fishes/students/focus/aviridis.htm>
has a nice pic of what I often see. I was not sure if there was
such a fish as a grouper, it seems that the ame is used:
"Groupers are fish of any of a number of genera in the subfamily
Epinephelinae of the family Serranidae, in the order Perciformes"
from Wiki.
--
dorayme
[Back to original message]
|