Posted by Neredbojias on 07/11/07 00:59

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:01
GMT dorayme scribed:

> In article
> <Xns9968ED0BC15D5nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
> Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ell, Duh!, it could hardly be higher now, could it? The only other
>> possibility was right on the head, which didn't seem particularly
>> likely for a first attempt.
>
> Look here, what is the matter with you. Read my words carefully.
> Go back and see how I said it could be higher, how you might have
> made a mistake in reasoning or figuring. Is that not possible at
> all (in the absence of any knowledge of the true solution)?

How could it possibly be higher when my calculations proved a maximum of
2000? I would not have posted the figure if there were any chance at all
of it being erroneous (-as a maximum.) Do you think I'm a ditz or what?

--
Neredbojias
A self-made man who worships his creator

[Back to original message]