Posted by dorayme on 07/11/07 09:09

In article
<Xns996A10D92A0Ananopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:14:32
> GMT dorayme scribed:
>
> > In article
> > <Xns9969B7015E475nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
> > Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> How could it possibly be higher when my calculations proved a maximum
> >> of 2000? I would not have posted the figure if there were any chance
> >> at all of it being erroneous (-as a maximum.) Do you think I'm a
> >> ditz or what?
> >
> > Of course not. I assume a ditz is something to do with
> > intelligence below a certain level, unlike schmuck which has more
> > to do with character? I know you are a schmuck.
>
> I gotta tell you this honestly and plain-out because you use that word so
> freely. In Jewish circles, at least American Jewish circles, a schmuck
> means a cocksucker. I trust that isn't what you mean because I believe you
> have more class than that.

Well now, it is not quite the meaning I had in mind. I suppose
you look at words from some rigid standard, you hear this word,
and you ferret out some information about some strict use of it
in some particular community and that is it for you.

But it is not how it is used generally by Jewish comedians, and
every one but the most boring and ignorant goy has a Jewish
comedian in them. Your interpretation and take on this is
ridiculous. So please don't be so honest with me. I beg you.

O and by the way, I have no class at all. And I know what Travis
would like me to say. But I resist. Being without class does not
mean there are no inhibitions at all.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]