Posted by Bergamot on 07/20/07 01:25

Ed Mullen wrote:
> Bergamot wrote:
>>
>> Seamonkey is just better for me. Firefox sux.
>
> The only marginal way (for me) that they might excel is in the number
> of extensions available for them. That will change as SM begins to
> adopt more of the core code from FF and TB.

There are instructions out there someplace on getting Fx extensions
working in Sm, but I haven't had the time to take a closer look. There
aren't that many I really want, anyway. Firebug would be one, though.

> The good thing is that the
> SM team is doing that slowly,

To me they're *painfully* slow about it. :)

> methodically and very carefully so as not
> to break the application while embracing "progress." God bless them.

Tis better to be careful about it, but 2.0 beta (alpha?) isn't near
ready yet. There are a couple serious bugs that are about a year old now
that make it pretty much unusable for me. It saddens me that follow up
isn't what it used to be. :(

--
Berg

[Back to original message]