Posted by Captain Paralytic on 07/27/07 14:10

On 27 Jul, 15:01, Webrickco <webric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 9:51 am, Captain Paralytic <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Jul, 22:19, tomb <t...@technetcenter.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thank you to all who have tried to help me, sorry to have bothered all
> > > of you. I just found that by generating values for all my text boxes in
> > > the php code, the reset button has no effect. I guess this was actually
> > > an HTML issue, like Rik said.
>
> > > Tom
>
> > Rik and I were both trying to tell you where you needed to go to get
> > the answer and all you would do in your arrogance was moan that the
> > advice wasn't what you wanted.
>
> > I think an apology to Rik would be nice.
>
> Next time someone is asking a question in a forum or a groups, you
> have 2 solutions:
> - You answer the question,
> - You don't anwser the question.
>
> If you choose to answer the question, which is noble from you to want
> to help other persons, and which is by the way one of the 2 reasons
> you are reading groups, you should put arrogance aside, and be
> pragmatic in your answer (telling someone to post elsewhere is ok
> since you also provide to his answer a trial to an adequate solution).
>
> You will avoid answers like "What does this have to do with PHP? And
> if you're planning to say
> something like, "I'm using PHP to generate the HTML and Javascript"
> don't even bother -- that's not the right answer.". This is NOT
> constructive, and a bit insulting.
>
> Respect these principle would have save this whole pointless
> conversation, in which, i believe Tom might have think with reason:
> "why the hell am i doing here?"
>
> Additionaly and to my own concern, when i ask someone for his opinion
> about something i've done, I except a few things:
> First, that he respects my work and the principles i'm using to
> achieve it. Like i said before there not only one good solution but
> plenty of them depending on situations. Second, that the answer given
> to my questions are arrogance free, so that i do not feel like a
> complete idiot. And finally that the comments and advise that are
> given remain as is, and free of subjective argumentation, which means,
> avoid things like: "this sucks" or "this is not impressive".
>
> By posting here, i was seeking for professional advise on my work. You
> could have answered or not. Someone like Rik Rasmus decided to answer
> me, regardless all principle declared before, which shows a complete
> disrespect for other people's work. Someone like Rik Rasmus, in my
> understanding, doesn't need apologies, and need to present some!
>
> (sorry if i use someone else's post to answer part of my own concerns)

does this have anything to do with my post?

and what does "By posting here, i was seeking for professional advise
on my work.", mean?
Your post in this thread didn't ask for any advice?

[Back to original message]