Posted by Chaddy2222 on 07/31/07 15:32

On Jul 31, 11:27 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net>
wrote:
> Chaddy2222 wrote:
> > On Jul 31, 8:38 pm, SpaceGirl <nothespacegirls...@subhuman.net> wrote:
> >> The example I always like to use when people say "Flash is always
> >> abused" is this:
>
> >>www.thefwa.com
>
> >> Many, many great Flash sites!
>
> > Hmmm, that would depend on what you think is "great".
>
> I have to agree with you there Chad. You must have had a great time try
> to read the above site! Usually bad HTML can still be accessible with a
> decent browser...flash you at the mercy of the "designer". If you are
> just doing body counts there will always be more bad HTML sites than
> FLASH, not too many newbies, code-monkeys, bone-heads are going to shell
> out the $$$ just to slap together one atrocious website...
>
Yeah, could not agree more. Although not many of the comercial sites I
have looked at in the last day or three have used flash, even
http://www.vtr.com.au have been paying atention to the Web Pages That
Suck articles that have been written about them!. Their site was
originally designed like a 3D game. This kind of proves SpaceGirls
theories wrong I think. Although people do seam to be having some kind
of obsetion with really small text on the main pages of site, WTF is
with that.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz

[Back to original message]