Posted by dorayme on 08/02/07 04:53

In article
<1186028978.021067.121490@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> On Aug 2, 4:20 am, Onideus Mad Hatter <use...@backwater-
> productions.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:38:06 -0700, Chaddy2222
> >

Why is it that replies to the hatter tend to be very long and
very unedited in the quoting? Is there some sort of guilty logic
at work here, the more the rubbish, the fact that anyone bothers
to get involved, the more they feel the need to get into the
spirit of all the bullshit with all the bells and whistles and
these here bells and these here whistles mean big time quoting
and hells bells I can feel a Bartish moment of my own welling up
and that means I better stop right now...

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]