Posted by Michael Fesser on 09/15/07 17:21

..oO(Jerry Stuckle)

>Michael Fesser wrote:
>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>
>>> How many innocent civilians?
>>
>> Not many. Just some millions. Nothing special.
>
>Yes? And you have some proof of that? Or are you just talking out your
>ass? I suspect the latter.

Of course you do, because offending people is the only you can do. Not
only here, but in nearly every third thread. Everyone who doesn't agree
with you or doesn't want to sleep with your president in his Or^Hval
Office is a troll, an ass hole or something like that.

When God handed out social competence, was it you who shouted the
loudest "Not me, not me!"?

>Try again - with some real facts.
>
>And he isn't doing a thing to _your_ European civil rights. And all the
>rest of your statements are full of even more crap.
>
>I really suggest you get some facts before you pull your head out of
>your ass again.

As I said - you could find proof if you _want_ to find it (for all the
things I said). There are enough resources available. But of course
since they are just websites written by one person or maybe a few, they
don't have any credibility and are not worth the bytes. In fact the only
real source of truth is whitehouse.gov. Sorry, I should have known that.

Just wondering - if the US would ever get a black president - would he
leave the White House as it is?

>> You can find enough resources in the web if you _want_ to find them.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War
>
>And you think that's the truth? ROFLMAO. It's ONE PERSON'S (or maybe a
>few people's) opinion.

I wouldn't call 150 references "a few people's opinions". And obviously
you think that even Amnesty International, Washington Post, CNN, BBC,
CBS, UN and whatever they're called don't have any credibility.

>I could write an article in wikipedia saying Michael Fesser is a horses
>ass. It would have more creditability that what you're pointing out.

Of course you can do that, I don't have a problem with that.
Of course you would also have to accept the consequences.

>But I forget - you believe everything you read on the internet.

Obviously you believe everything you see on TV. And just in case you
still live back in the 1850's - even reputable and credible news paper
magazines, scientific articles and such are available on the net. You
just have to know _where_ to search.

>> And before you laugh at Wikipedia or deny their credibility - there are
>> more than 150 references for all the claims and statements made in that
>> article. "Oil" is a major section in it - and it is proved.
>
>Yep, and how "accurate" are those references? Most are other websites
>with just as little credibility.

I knew you would say that.

>And hey - I didn't bring up the topic.

Neither did I. I just can't stand your damn arrogance and egoism.

>And no one asked you to stick
>your fat ass in here.
>
>If there's anyone who's a troll, it's you.

Thanks for that, old man. If arrogance would squeak, you would have to
walk around with an oil can all day.

Micha

[Back to original message]