Reply to Re: OT - Oh, so OT.

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Steve on 09/18/07 15:01

"Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message
news:13evoir44bali44@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
> news:0bRHi.6$W76.1@newsfe12.lga...
>>
>> "Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message
>> news:13evm5v1at70h21@corp.supernews.com...
>>> Steve, I know that atheists like to claim that it is "lack of belief",
>>> but go to websters at www.m-w.com. It specifically states that it is
>>> "disbelief in the existence of deity". What you call "atheism" is
>>> really "agnosticism". Again, from Websters:
>>
>> negative, ghost rider.
>>
>> i am without belief in god. remember your latin. i am without belief in
>> god. whatever you want to call that, that's what i am. i see no evidence
>> for god, and in such a state, i cannot be agnostic. i do not allow for
>> the possibility of god's existence due to lack of evidence. agnostics
>> believe that god could possibly exist, we just cannot know for sure. that
>> is NOT me.
>>
>> i don't know where i'm losing you here, shelly. perhaps we have different
>> versions of websters. perhaps as she aged, meriam couldn't help herself
>> either and started using disbelief - which means there is evidence there
>> is something in which to believe...a gross presumption. try other
>> dictionaries. they all differ. hell, dictionary.com definition shows many
>> sources. here's what i love seeing...it shows complete lack of
>> understanding which is why we are having this discourse.
>>
>> american heritage:
>>
>> disbelief or denial of the existence of god or gods.
>>
>> right next to:
>>
>> a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
>>
>> doesn't denial mean there is unequivically something in evidence for me
>> to deny? are you getting my point?
>
> No, and yes. Example:
>
> Statgement: "I watched TV last night"
> Denial: No you didn't.
>
> Where is there something in unequivocably in evidence for having watched
> TV last night? It is still a "denial".

good point. however, it is what is done after 'denial' that makes an atheist
or agnostic.

> OK, you can live with your definition from American Heritage. All my
> life, we always referred to Websters, so I'll live with mine.

i perfer not being labeled at all. ;^)

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация