Posted by rf on 09/19/07 01:51

"Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
news:47%Hi.9082$z_5.811@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 2007-09-17, bizshop wrote:
>>
>>>>>Oh, and I could change 2007-06-24 to 6-24-07
>>>
>>>No need for the dashes - and 20070624.is ISO proper.
>>
>> ISO requires the dashes, and it is 2007-06-24 not the nonsensical
>> 6-24-07.
>
> I've got both systems now. 6-24-07 is what I'm most comfortable with

You might be but less that 5% of the planet uses that format. The other 95%
will wonder what the 24th month of the year is.

--
Richard.

[Back to original message]