Posted by Steve on 09/20/07 05:27

"Herb" <herb_k@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1190250441.341187.272110@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 19, 7:23 pm, "Shelly" <sheldonlg.n...@asap-consult.com> wrote:
>
>> NO ONE IS PREVENTING YOU FROM PRACTICING YOUR RELIGION.
>
>> Shelly
>
> as a factual point, you are quite incorrect. The counter group to the
> ACLU is the ACLJ. They have gone from state to state, suing school
> districts, local governments and other entities who have been actively
> infringing on the rights of Christians. They have been mainly
> successful in these lawsuits.
>
> So you are wrong - reverse discrimination is very well established and
> has been actively pursuing its own bigotry. In fact, reverse
> discrimination of all kinds has become the dominant form of bigotry in
> the US.
>
> A small group of Christians was jailed near Philadelphia PA for
> carryihg signs at a gay festival. They faced 40+ years for trumped up
> "hate crime" charges. Name any recent instance when non-Christians
> suffered any similar peril via govt action.
>
> (You likely haven't heard of this since the liberal bigots who control
> most of the US media sat on the story - naturally.)

funny then, that it never surfaced on hannity and colmbs either...or any fox
network communications that i recall either.

as for your 'detailed' expultion of platitude, post your references/cites.
otherwise, it's all self-serving, meaningless, and probably just made-up.
see, with cites, we may discover that the 'small group of christians'
consisted of two assholes who violated local laws governing the proper
manner in which they could protest...say, like, blocking the parade or
pissing in the punch bowl.

as it is, history is wrot with the crushing conquest of religion. don't
expect sympathy from me when i really couldn't care less about the two
assholes who didn't obey the law.

and hey, by 'mainly successful', do you mean 'outta two cases, they almost
won one'? you see now why cites and references help your cause?

one more question. how does one get a notion (reverse-descrimination) to
*actively* pursue its own biggotry (another notion). do they run fast? they
taking their time? is one faster than the other? what happens when the one
catches up with the other? sorry, that was a few more questions than just
one.

i hate to burst your bubble, but the KKK has been faced with the same
consequences while later being the recipient of the protection of the law
that they had violated - this in regard to 'name any recent instance...blah,
blah, blah'. are you going to say that the KKK (all of them, any of them)
are representative or resembling christians? did they not violate the law?
was the law not applied for their right to peaceful assembly? sorry, the
courts aren't as twisted as your synicism and paranoia would dictate.

[Back to original message]