Posted by asdf on 09/26/07 05:32

"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote in message
news:eRlKi.228892$GM1.101087@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> Scripsit dorayme:
>
>> What you said was correct but not really relevant to OPs
>> question. His question assumed the employee/author knew this
>> stuff.
>
> When we know that the implicit assumptions of a question are wrong, then
> it is surely relevant to address them. You might decide not to answer at
> all, but if you do, why would you answer under assumptions that are known
> to be wrong?
>
> It is virtually certain that the employee or author does not know "this
> stuff". If you read the original question with open eyes, this should
> become obvious.
>
> --
> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

for once, i agree with jukka :)) Nice one!

[Back to original message]