Posted by Steve on 09/27/07 13:13

"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:V1NKi.37164$RX.1442@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
> news:4QuKi.8$M31.2@newsfe06.lga...
>> "Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message
>
>>> Why????? That, to me, is like looking at a big console radio and
>>> expecting to see the show. Why type? Why not simply TALK? OK, I can
>>> see one reason. That would be to send a message if the person isn't
>>> answering. Then, again, isn't that what voicemail is for?
>>
>> nah, that's so they can 'talk' during class or church or whatever else of
>> benefit they should be engaged in. it also costs less than actually
>> talking.
>
> Oh, MAN does my niece ever wish THAT were true.
> Our calling program charged something like 10cents for every message.
> At first, some days, she'd text back-and-forth 20+ times in a day.
> She spent her entire first Starbucks paycheck on that.

2 bucks?

(just play'n)

[Back to original message]