|
|
Posted by Neil on 10/02/07 20:30
Well, we kind of don't have a DBA. :-(
We have the system admin, who sets up the boxes, installs the client and
network software, etc., but knows next to nothing about SQL Server.
Then we have me, the developer, using SQL Server as the back end to our
database (Access), and proficient in developing in SQL Server, but somewhat
weak when it comes to administrating it.
So that's the reality of the situation.......
As for users, we have about 30 users connected over a LAN; about another
10-15 connected through a WAN; and are going to have a new location opening
with another, I'd guess, 5-10 users at most over the WAN. So total users is
about 50.
Thanks for your assistance!
Neil
"Ekrem Φnsoy" <ekrem@btegitim.com> wrote in message
news:1D4A1157-F7D4-42EA-9B28-436D8F421E2D@microsoft.com...
> Hello Neil!
>
>
> It always depends... :)
>
> Nobody knows about your environment's workload. 2GB of RAM might be enough
> for 80 people over 100 but may not be enough for other 20 people.
> It's your DBA who is gonna decide if it's OK for your environment or not.
> He or whoever your DBA, needs to analyse your needs.
>
>
> --
> Ekrem Φnsoy
>
>
>
> "Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:UGwMi.56827$YL5.48655@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>> We are migrating to a new server, running Server 2003 SP2, and SQL Server
>> 2005. The server has 2 GB of RAM, which seems a bit low to me. Any
>> thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
[Back to original message]
|