Posted by Travis Newbury on 10/05/07 09:06

On Oct 4, 11:48 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all, I just found this article on the Target case and thought that
> a lot of you would be interested.http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071003/wr_nm/target_blind_dc_4

In a strictly legal sense this is really nothing. All it means is
that they will go to trial. But Target will end up losing in the
socialistic courts of California, and we will move one step closer to
a bland vanilla world where there is no incentive to draw with color.

You know, if they put a cap on the amount of money trial lawyers could
make this lawsuit (as well as thousands of others) would disappear in
about a second.

Or better yet, how about if you sue someone and lose then both the
plaintiff and the lawyer are equally responsible for the defendant's
leagal fees, expenses, and a little punitive money. THAT would put an
end to some of this bullshit.

[Back to original message]