Posted by Travis Newbury on 10/07/07 17:36

On Oct 6, 6:44 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <1191685585.333485.3...@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> Travis Newbury <TravisNewb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 5, 6:27 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > In article <6443e$47066d6e$40cba7be$6...@NAXS.COM>,
> > > "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:
> > > > Again, we keep hearing about these wonderful, accessible, low-bandwidth
> > > > flash sites but no examples... Sounds like a Unicorn hunt.
>
> > > I do recall someone (I think it might have been Bergamot) putting
> > > a similar and very reasonable question to old Travis a while
> > > back. Travis disappeared for a while, it was the most silent I
> > > have ever heard him be. I think he might have hurried to a
> > > holiday destination the furthest from any computer likely to have
> > > a connection to a ng.
>
> > > --
> > > dorayme
>
> > Provided an example yesterday look for it in this thread.
>
> I did notice a huge hunk of impressive looking code from you soon
> after I posted. This is a "wonderful, accessible, low-bandwidth
> flash site"?
>
> Seriously, I am sure it is something; but an example of a site
> site it is not.
>
> --
> dorayme

It is an example of a 5K piece of flash that can do a shit load of
stuff (this meets all the criteria for the unicorn site)

And no, it is not on line anywhere, but I will be more that willing to
email it to who ever wants it. Both the SWF file and the FLA so you
can see how it works.

[Back to original message]