Posted by Chaddy2222 on 10/08/07 12:06

On Oct 8, 9:28 pm, Travis Newbury <TravisNewb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 8, 5:26 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicur...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.mortgagenews2.com
> > It's from the same company that SpaceGirl gave the previous example
> > from. It's a shocker though, I mean it should have been done in HTML +
> > CSS for style + PHP / some other server side language for the user
> > account stuff.
>
> A "Shocker" Hardly.
>
Hmmm, well it does look quite good i'll give it that.

> Should have? We can not tell because we do not know the audience well
> enough to make that decision.
>
> Could have, absolutely. The company and developers need to understand
> what their visitors want. You don't know, there may have been a
> calling for this.

True, I don't have much of a problem with the overall look of the site
but it just seams to have been poorly implemented.
An example of this is the use of frames, a very old technology and the
fact that it's not accessible by search engions or my screen reader,
which was the entire point of what I wrote.
But, maybe they don't care about SE ranking or being sued for that
matter.
It's an information site, what they have done is a nice example of
what you can do visually with Flash but frankly it's overkill as far
as I am concerned.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz

[Back to original message]