Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/08/07 12:29

SpaceGirl wrote:
> On Oct 8, 10:26 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
> sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 6:02 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:> Phil Payne wrote:
>>>>> It is not really about processor speed (unless your using an old 486)
>>>>> but connection speed. Yours was broadband. My point is not everyone
>>>>> 'has|can have|will have in the near future' access to broadband.
>>>> But even on broadband - 30 seconds?
>>>> Most users have MUCH shorter fuses and would long since have clicked
>>>> away.
>>> Ohhhh! I see your point. Sorry dialup-mindset. Sometimes I *wish* a page
>>> loaded in 30 seconds!
>> http://www.mortgagenews2.com
>> It's from the same company that SpaceGirl gave the previous example
>> from. It's a shocker though, I mean it should have been done in HTML +
>> CSS for style + PHP / some other server side language for the user
>> account stuff.
>
> Why should it have? Because you don't like Flash?
>

When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

I happen to agree. Flash is good for some things. But this could have
been easily done without it. And I think it should have been.

It would have been smaller and faster. It could have been spidered by
the search engines (probably not applicable in this particular case).

But most of all, it would have been accessible to the blind.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]