Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/08/07 14:09

Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Oct 8, 8:41 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicur...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Not really, it's just that it would have been a lot quicker to develop
>> useing HTML / CSS and PHP then it would have been useing Flash.
>> Oh yeah and I would have been able to read the bloody thing.
>
> It would have been faster for YOU to develop it in HTML/CSS/PHP. You
> don't know how to develop a flash application so you can not say it is
> a slower development process.
>
>> Oh yeah and I would have been able to read the bloody thing.
> Zoom.... (Yes I know the zoom feature sucks)
>

So are you saying it is NOT faster to develop in HTML/CSS/PHP? Or are
you just blowing hot air?

The fact is - whether you like it or not - this is a lousy application
for flash. And every one of those reasons you dismiss so handily show
how closed minded you really are.

I'm not saying flash isn't worthwhile. But unlike you, I don't think
it's applicable to everything - and certainly not here.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]