Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 10/08/07 07:10

On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:31:38 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
<brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:

>> I just want to make sure you comprehend what you're dealing with
>> before you make some really stupid fuckin mistake (like the last
>> d00d). You've been feigning thick skin, but I wonder how thick it
>> really goes. Most people draw the line at some point...and I very
>> frequently have a tendency to cross those lines. So I'm basically
>> just telling you to be aware of just how far over the line I'll go
>> online.

>Dear me... I'm quivering.

....ewww.

>You see, I don't have an attachment to
>something like usenet. I could happily unplug tommorow and not miss
>anything at all. This makes your silly threats rather pointless.

We'll see. I've heard that line before though, most often followed up
in three to six months with, "you crossed the line this time!"

Don't worry, if/when you do, I'll be sure to post a Google link to
your last message. ^_^

>>> I think I struck a nerve =]

>> Yeah, the one that makes me beat n00b.jobs.

>Like the n00b.job that your website has shown itself to be?

Son, I don't know if you've noticed it or not (yer kinda stupid so
maybe not) but pretty much every bad thing you've tried to say about
my sites has been completely ripped apart in six or eight different
directions. You'd think after awhile you would like get a fuckin cl00
and realize that you're essentially a high school dropout trying to
argue quantum mechanics with fuckin Einstein, but no, you just keep
tryin. Maybe you just enjoy failing, is that it?

>So you're threatening me with violence?

I think maybe we've already been over your horrible deficiency when it
comes to comprehending the little things like METAPHORS. Woah, sure
is complicated for you, innt?

>Surely you don't say that when you're level headed.

Next time I'll say "verbally beat" just so you won't get confused so
easily, child. I keep forgetting that you never managed to make it
past 5th grade English.

>> Sure, if you wanna wind up with something that looks like this:
>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_PoE/PoEtards_Are_THE_Dumbest_Mother_Fuckers.png

>That's all you could accomplish with photoshop? You should take a course
> or something.

No, Retard, that's all the better people like YOU are able to
accomplish WITHOUT the use of MY sprite generator. Maybe you ought to
start taking notes or something? It seems the longer these posts get
the harder time you have tracking. Do you have sequencing problems or
something? Are you a chromosomal deficient? Just what is it exactly
that makes you so gawd damn Jesus raping stupid?

>> Free cl00, Dipshit, Photoshop isn't some magixal program that can just
>> churn out teh uber graphics with nothing more than a few clicks of the
>> mouse. It requires SKILL and ABILITY.

>Which is more flexible than selecting pre-built bitmaps and sandwiching
>them together.

And how would you "sandwich" them together using nothing but HTML
code, you stupid dipshit? At the very least you would need CSS to
stack them, but then you would need javascript at the very least in
order to allow dynamic loading of sprite images...and at that point
you've already crossed over that magical line you set in the sand with
no javascript, so yer fucked d00d...yer fucked and you didn't even
manage to find a way that would actually combine the images into one
savable graphic that the user could download...unless, again, you
expect the user to have to use print screen and then paste it into a
separate graphics program and save it that way.

I hope you realize kid, that the more you talk, the more you show off
just how LITTLE you understand about web coding...not that, that's
some big surprise, most Amish of the Internet have very little
comprehension as to how everything works. Your thought process runs
like:
"Microsoft bad"
"Different good"
"Outdated good"
"Deficient good"
"Learning new things bad"
"Change bad"
"Me no like evil Microsoft"

Really, you aren't capable of thinking too far beyond that, are you?

>> Some of the custom parts I've
>> made for the generator took HOURS to construct. And even reworking
>> existing parts to work on my models takes upwards of an hour per.
>> Creating the layer splits and testing adds on yet another half hour.

>You poor soul. Too bad no one thought you were talented enough to employ
>you as a graphics designer - hence the big shiny donate button.

I do freelance graphic design work all the time you retard. The last
publicized one I did was nyah:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_adg/In_Progress_4.png

A raster to raster/vector hybrid conversion...not that YOU have any
fuckin clue as to what that means, huh kid? Quick, run and Google,
try and play pretend! LOL, I don't know what's funnier, the fact that
you wanna play pretend web designer or the fact that you think you can
fool people with such slipping dives into the most superficial of
Google searches.

>>> I'm not saying flash isn't useful. Hell, I even use it on my site for
>>> non-atomic design elements. It should never, ever be relied on, however.
>>> I bet you never learned that from HTML for Dummies.

>> Sorry, Dummie, but my knowledge wasn't slurped up from some third
>> party, it comes directly from my own methodical testing and
>> experimentation. As far as a user front end...you don't even need
>> HTML anymore:
>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/Forum_Template/index.swf

>I'd be curious to see how your testing weighs up to the research done by
>the W3 consortium.

*shakes head*

You don't even realize how fuckin stupid that last statement of yours
made you sound, do you?

Free cl00, dipshit, the W3C does not set standards nor do they really
do any sort of "research". All the W3C does is set a bunch of
arbitrary, useless, PROPOSED "standards"...which aren't actually
followed by...well, anybody. Since no browser maker follows all of
the W3Cs PROPOSED "standards", well, that often makes W3C
compatibility the MOST INcompatible and NONcross-compatible way of
doing things. Very, very, very few people will actually go through
and methodically test every last little fuckin tag and CSS property on
every last fuckin browser version on every last fuckin operating
system imaginable in order to TRULY find out the MOST cross compatible
methods. The W3C does NOT do that, they unreasonably expect all
browser makers to simply follow their RECOMMENDED "standards" and
their attitude is basically, "To hell with any browser/OS combo that
doesn't." ...which, you know, is ALL of them. *rolls eyes*

Keep Google diving for outdated intelligence though, Slurps, it's
pretty amusing to rip apart at least.

>>>> The Sprite Generator wasn't made for your type. Now go plow yourself
>>>> a cornfield you stupid hat wearing, Amish pig fucker.

>>> L-O-L. You're working yourself up some bad now dear.

>> L-O-L-L-E-R-C-O-P-T-E-R!!1!!1!!!!

>> ...he's laughing everyone...REALLY. *nods*

>I did have a snigger at that comment - I just find your brash commments
>pretty amusing.

Guess which ONE of us cares! ^_^

>>> It seems to me that people with more knowledge turn off javascript -
>>> probably because they check milw0rm daily and realise that 99% of remote
>>> attacks are in fact script based. Ask your gran if she leaves JS off and
>>> she'll not have a clue as to what you're talking about.
>>
>> WRONG!

>> 99.9% of ALL attacks are SE based, social engineering. Even if they
>> happen to use scripts they STILL require user stupidity to work.
>> That's why the smarter people don't disable javascript, because
>> they're not dumb enough to fall for stupid SE tricks. And as you
>> said, everyone else just ignores the problem.

>Sorry, have you actually even read milw0rm? It's not a glo<COCK SLAP>

Have YOU actually read anything on the site? Wait, no, more
importantly, did you actually COMPREHEND anything on the site? I only
ask cause uh, if you use their lil search tool and look for
"javascript", you get like seven hits...none of which are relevant.
There's like two patched Firefox vulnerabilities, one patched
Konqueror vulnerability, an Outhouse Express vulnerability and some
other retarded nonsense "exploits".

....wow...tell me again why it is that your stupid ass is so fearful
and scared of teh big bad javascript?

Oh, coincidentally, a search for PHP brings up over a hundred
exploits...LOL, rather ironic really, innt? ^_^

>>> Also, why do you need JS to load a flash object?

>> I don't, but it's needed for other things, like my site tracker that I
>> plan to put on all my sites.

>So you don't need code to load your flash animation but it's there
>anyway? I really don't follow.

Reading comprehension sure is a bitch for you, innt? What part of
IT'S NEEDED FOR OTHER THINGS did you NOT comprehend the first time I
said it? I mean what the fuck man are you taking stupid pills today
or what?

>>> Bang on! I do like nondescript, plain text _content_. It provides
>>> information to me, more so than flashing animations.

>> And this is where you're shortsighted. You don't comprehend the
>> concept of using design to enhance the content. Refer to this post:
>> : http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34733&messageID=639263&start=-9994

>Why would I refer to a post that you yourself wrote? Sounds a bit
>pointless to me. Every respected author on the web uses CSS styling to
>show emphasis - not CAPITALS. No one likes to read a post that shouts at
>them. I seem to recall that blogs are "tweenage blogger board hoo-ha".
>What on earth are you doing posting to one?

Maybe if you had the capability to read it you would know why, eh
Stupid?

Personally though, I like you better NOT reading it, keeping the dumb,
dumber servers me far better than it does to hinder me.

>>>>> You could make the same thing
>>>>> using proper (X)HTML better, faster and more extensible.

>>>> LOL, you stupid retard, you have no idea what you're even talking
>>>> about (hell your stupid ass probably hasn't even seen it).

>>> Seen what? XHTML? Dear me, someone hasn't done their research. Google
>>> dork my name and read my page's source code. I'd like to see what you
>>> mean when you realise that I use modern Doctypes and language for my
>>> pages, fonts and colour schemes that are easy on the eye, and will
>>> render on anything from a V100 terminal to a graphics workstation.

>> Yeah and none of yer content is worth looking at as a result.

>Denial ;]

Let me know when you manage to read through (and comprehend) that
link, Junior. Until then you're not much more than a foolish child in
my eyes. Maybe someday you'll comprehend what "design" is all about,
until then, you're stuck with making sites that are so pathetic they
can't even manage to show up in Alexa:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=www.brendangillatt.co.uk

LOL, you're so pathetic you practically have NEGATIVE visitors! ^_^

I love your "bog":

"Coming Soon"

*snicker*

Wait, it gets funnier!

"I'm hacking Simple PHP Blog"

Translation:

"I'm spaghetti bitching someone else's code cause I'm too damn stupid
to figure out how to do it myself."

" to fit in with my site theme at the moment."

....WHAT THEME!? Goober, you don't HAVE a theme. You have a LACK of
theme. LOL

Pretty much all you would need to do is take out any graphics and
change the colors to black text on a white background and you'd be
fuckin done.

"It shouldn't be too long before it's sorted out."

....just as soon as you figure out how to code. LOL, sure kid, sure.
Let us all know when you finally manage to get out of yer diapers and
start coding something that's got some meat on it.

Have you seen my blog btw?

http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog/

....completely custom, all my own code, Flash front end with a PHP/SQL
backend. Embeded video with custom controls, clickable calendar
navigation tool with a slick, appealing and engaging design. My blog
generates around $25 a month in ad hits. How much money do you make
with your blog? Oh, right, you don't have one, huh? LOL

Face it kid, yer just some stupid ass poser bitch running around
playing wannabe web developer and you don't even have a fuckin cl00.
You try and couch your lack of ability in areas like interface design
and graphics in the form of some "I art holier than thou minimalism".
What you fail to comprehend is that not having a design doesn't equate
to a minimalist design. Minimalism is actually about presenting
COMPLEX designs using simple forms. Essentially, the more complex
design you're able to create with simple shapes and other forms, the
more advanced your minimalist design is. In your case, you HAVE NO
DESIGN, period, you have a void, a pit of desolation and boredom that
does nothing but emphasize just how mundane and trite the little
content you have is.

In your case you don't need a website, you need an RSS feed, that's
it. Hell, a fuckin RSS feed would have more of a design than your
sloppy molestation of HTML.

>>>> The ONLY
>>>> other thing that it could have possibly been made with was
>>>> Java...that's it, Java, that's the only other web language available
>>>> that has color transform matrices (amongst a slew of other stuff
>>>> that's needed). You could ~possibly~ half-ass it in PHP and
>>>> javascript, but it'd be WAY inefficient and the home brew color
>>>> transform matrices wouldn't be nearly as good.

>>> Errr, your "colour transform matrices" aren't all that complex. I've
>>> seen your ActionScript and I could write that in 2 hours in PHP.

>> Then let's see you do it! You run at the mouth pretty good, talkin
>> shit, claiming how easy it is, so do it, Mouth! Or is pullin shit out
>> of yer ass all the better you can do?

>Okay what would you like me to do? What transform would you like me to
>code? I charge £15 per hour I warn.

I'll pay you a BILLION DOLLARS if you can recreate my sprite generator
and ALL of its functionality using nothing but HTML and CSS (your
claim).

Get crackin, Junior!

LOL, what a fuckin poser class college flunkie retard you are. ^_^

>>>> The only thing HTML is good for is displaying simple pictures and
>>>> text...and it's not even very good at that. Flash supports 32 bit
>>>> alpha transparent JPEGs fer fuck sake! Not that you have any fuckin
>>>> clue as to what those are, why you would want to use them and most
>>>> importantly HOW you would use them. See that really is the basis of
>>>> everything you're babbling...ignorance.
>>
>>> Since when did JPEGs have alpha channels? Flash supports sprites that
>>> are generated from JPEGs and then have an alpha channel applied.
>>>
>>> Don't even think about mentioning JPEG2000s - no one uses them and they
>>> will die away slowly like the internet fad that you are.
>>
>> Refer to this post:
>> : http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34733&messageID=639224&start=-9994
>>
>> "Support of 32 bit JPEGs (more specifically you can import 32 PNG
>> files, use JPEG compression on them and Flash will keep the
>> transparency layer intact)."

>Hence not supporting alpha channel JPEGS (whatever they may be). You can
>infact do exactly the same in PHP, saving it as a GD bitmap after
>importing JPEGs

No, ya can't, Stupid. There ya go, runnin at the mouth again. Once
again, the difference between the two of us is that I have actual,
live, working examples of EVERY concept I claim, where as you...well
you're still trying to rip off someone else's blog, huh kid? *nods*

>>>> Of course it's slow you retard, do you have any fuckin idea as to what
>>>> it's even doing? There's a couple methods I plan to employ in the
>>>> next version that maybe be able to speed it up a bit, using
>>>> ByteArray.compress() but ultimately the speed issue is affected most
>>>> by the number of users who are using it, and, well, that's quite a
>>>> damn lot:
>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Well_That_Aint_Good.png
>>>>
>>>> You have understand, Shortsighted, I ain't runnin some tweenage muppet
>>>> fuck Pokemon fan site with 12 hits a month, collectively my sites get
>>>> upwards of around a HALF MILLION unique hits every month.

>>> You mean, like HALF A MILLION? wow! My home computer could handle that.
>>> And yes I have stress tested way over that.

>> *pats you on the head*
>>
>> Sure kid, sure.

>*grin* Let's do the mathematics.
>60 seconds in a minute *
>60 minutes in an hour *
>24 hours in a day *
>30 days in a month =
>2,592,000 seconds in a month.
>
>If you get 500,000 hits per month that's
>
>2,592,000/500,000 = 5.184
>
>One hit every 5 seconds! Phew, you work your quad core some hard!

And the amateur shows off his idiocy once again. Free cl00, dipshit,
every visitor is not going to magically space themselves apart just
for the benefit of your magical equation. In REALITY you would
probably wind up with like 500 simultaneous hits right at say 5:45pm
pacific time and would maybe only have like 5 hits from 1:00am to
5:00am pacific time.

As fuckin retarded as you are you obviously lack the ability to
comprehend how things work in the REAL WORLD. But then, how could
you, I mean your site generates so little traffic you can't even
manage to make it on Alexa fer fuck sake.

Not to mention if those 500 simultaneous hits are all engaging in CPU
intensive tasks (like saving sprite sheets in which the graphics are
constructed from scratch at the bit level), or serving video streams,
etc, etc.

>>>> But then your type isn't much for actually doing your own tests and
>>>> benchmarking. Pretty much you just slurp up someone else's bullshit
>>>> and then call it good. Free cl00, that method, it's the MOST CROSS
>>>> COMPATIBLE WAY of achieving that "portal" look

>>> No it isn't. That's what _you_ believe is. Simply because you have never
>>> tried CSS.

>> WRONG! Again, stupid, I've TRIED ALL EXISTING METHODS and I've tested
>> them ON ALL MAJOR BROWSERS ON ALL MAJOR OPERATING SYSTEMS...and yer
>> CSS way breaks on a whole fuckin slew of combinations (like IE on teh
>> Mac).

>No, you obviously have bad CSS skills. Every piece of CSS I have written
>works on all browsers and OSs I've tested. That includes Mac, Win
>95-Vista, various linux distros, solaris 10, my pocketpc phone with
>Firefox, Opera, Safari, IE mobile, Opera mobile, lynx, Konquerer, etc.

So let's see it, Junior. Let's see "your" rendition of the "portal
look" using CSS...and by "your" I mean the code you ripped off from
someone else who CLAIMED that it was cross compatible.

Once you get yer example up I'll bitch slap you proper with a few
screen shots. Hell, I'll even throw in a few links where other people
point blank say what it does and doesn't work on.

....oh, btw, no one, least of all me, is ~actually~ expecting you to
put up an example. Simply put, at this point, no one believes you're
anything more than some poser class wannabe whose runnin the fuck at
the mouth about shit you've never done (and won't ever do).

>> My way is the MOST cross compatible way that exists, I know
>> that for a fact because *I* actually tested it myself. I tested all
>> the other methods too (which is why I know they don't work as well).

>What you did was to start off with an assumption that flash is the best
>way then disregarded everything else.

WRONG!

I actually used to not like Flash, I started off as a big CSS and
javascript supporter...until I actually took the bother to do my own
testing, benchmarking and experimentation and found it to be wholly
lacking. But then, what would you know about it, you can't even
manage to steal someone else's code for yer fuckin blog. LOL

>>>> (vertical and
>>>> horizontal centering)...well, most cross compatible next to Flash.
>>>> You can achieve the same effect with Flash and you don't even need
>>>> HTML code:
>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/Forum_Template/index.swf

>>> So why don't you just go ahead and serve that to your poor visitors?
>>
>> I probably will at some point, it's the direction that I'm headed in.
>> My web design model continually changes and evolves.

>It doesn't seem to. It seems very much static with regards to the fact
>that flash is the _only_ design element you use.

Yes well I think we've firmly establish that you're a complete and
total retard when it comes to these sorts of things. Most of my
current sites are actually a mixture of Flash, javascript, vbscript,
PHP, XML, CSS, SQL, etc, etc. In fact I don't even HAVE a site that
only uses ONE web coding form. And many of my sites aren't even using
any Flash. Like the Datarchive for example:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/data_archive/

Or the NP Index site:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/npindex/index.html

Or the perfect liquid prototype:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/liquid/

Or the Histology site:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/histology-1/

Etc, etc, etc.

Again though, half the time you're just making a bunch of ASSumptions
based on a limited sampling. Which coincidentally is why you can't
even manage to rip off someone else's code for your blog. You simply
haven't the attention span needed to even comprehend their code in the
first place. Instead you skim and jump to conclusions as you dance
through it, not understanding a word of it and wasting all your time
in the process.

Tell us though, do you fuck like you code? Sloppy and deficient. LOL

>>>>> 4) You send the whole lot of sprites to the server only for it to just
>>>>> save the bitmaps as a PNG. All that can be done in PHP
>>>> Your ignorance is showing once again. Free cl00, you retard, you can
>>>> alter the individual hue/sat/lightness of object parts and PHP doesn't
>>>> have any sort of prebuilt color matrices. You could half-ass your own
>>>> I suppose, but they wouldn't even be as remotely as good as the ones
>>>> prebuilt into Flash (not to mention they would be slow as fuck in PHP
>>>> and would eat up a shit load of server resources).

>>> No actually they don't. I've done colour transforms in PHP and they can
>>> be made fantastically fast.

>> Yeah, fantastically fast, limiting and half-ass!

>I'm not sure how you coded yours but all the stuff I've done with
>graphics in PHP is blindingly fast. More so when you use graphics as
>small as sprites.

What the fuck do you mean 'all the stuff you've done', you haven't
done ANYTHING with graphics in PHP you fuckin retard! Hell, you're so
damn fuckwitted you can't even manage to rip off someone else's blog
code!

>>> If you're unhappy about the speed of PHP go
>>> to C. Actually don't bother, you'll just end up crashing your server.

>> Yeah, because that plays *SO* nice with other web language forms.
>> *rolls eyes*

>What was that? 'web language forms'? Please explain your terminology.

Why bother, you wouldn't comprehend it.

>The only languages you use are PHP and flash.

Flash isn't a language, Numbnuts. I use ACTIONSCRIPT and I use a hell
of a lot more than just ActionScript and PHP. Of course, you're so
fuckin stupid I can see as how you wouldn't be able to tell. Hell yer
dumbass probably doesn't even know how to look at the source code of
someone else's site.

>Flash doesn't give a damn
>what you have on the server and PHP will happily run alongside C. Why do
>you think it will not?.

Why do you think it will? I mean it's not like you have any
experience or sites or examples showing that you've even attempted to
do it in the first place. Why do you make the ASSumption based on
ZERO first hand knowledge and experience? Show me the code, Junior,
show me the code...otherwise all yer doin is talkin shit, you poser
class wannabe.

>>>>> 5) The saving animation actually does nothing at all - it's simply a
>>>>> sprite. A very pointless, time wasting sprite.

>>>> Again, Dumbfuck, yer ignorance is showing. The sprite sheet that's
>>>> generated is for use in the program RPG Maker XP. You import the
>>>> sprite sheets you create and then use them in your custom made game.
>>>> They're not for like fuckin avatars or some other kind of tweenage
>>>> blogger board hoo-ha.

>>> Sorry.. what? Did I even mention the sprite sheets? No - I meant the
>>> stupid bar that takes days to scroll across the screen before finally
>>> sending the data to your PHP.

>> If you're bitching about the time it takes to save, sorry, but that's
>> as fast as it can go right now. The next version will be somewhat
>> faster, I plan to use the Byte.compress() class and some other tricks,
>> but overall there is no way to REALLY make it uber speedy (or if there
>> is, no one has developed it yet).

>No that saving thing actually doesn't do anything at all - it is a
>sprite. I decompiled your crappy flash and it is a fixed length sprite
>that will take the same amount of time to traverse no matter what the
>flash is doing.

You didn't decompile anything you retarded fuckwit and you don't even
have the first clue as to how the sprite generator even works.

>Yes you already mentioned compression, something that will make a
>negligible difference to the speed.

Keep pretending that you know what you're talking about, it'll make it
that much more amusing in the next release version when the speed is
increased by about 20%. And yes, I'll be sure to verbally molest you
up your ass with your own fuckwitted stupidity when I do it. Oh and
unlike you, I actually make good on what I claim to code, where as
you, well, let us know if you ever manage to finish ripping off
someone else's blogger board code you retarded fuckwit. And no, none
of us is holding our breath.

>The way to make it faster is to get rid of that stupid sprite and use a
>real language - not ActionScript.

LOL, you really are living in a bubble of idiocy, aren't you? ^_^

I hope you don't ever plan to actually try and make money off web
design/coding...cause with yer present skill set and
understanding...yeah, yer a wannabe, poser class, college flunkie scam
artist at best.

As far as technical ability, well, all you've proven thus far is that
you TRY and rip off other people's code and you're really good at
takin shit apart...I know a lot of little kids like that. Hell, I
remember being your age, six years old, going around taking everything
apart...LOL...eventually though I grew the fuck up and learned how to
BUILD things, instead of just takin 'em apart. Let us know when you
finally get to that level, Halfass.

>>>> You're not so good with the metaphors, are you?

>>> I believe me I am. Just not ones that don't actually have meanings.

>> Uh huh. You must have some kind of mental disorder if there's no way
>> you can imagine words having a fire like destruction to them. Where
>> the fuck do you think the word "flame" (in relation to posts) came
>> from, you stupid dipshit.

>Not from physically burning words I'm pretty sure =]

It's the whole METAPHOR part you seem to keep fucking up on. Here,
see if you can't educate yourself you dribbling little crotch goblin:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/metaphor

Now, tell the class, just what the fuck part of "NOT LITERALLY" are
you failing to grasp?

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog


Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."

"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."

"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."

"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."

"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"

"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."

"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."

"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."

"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"

"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."

"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."

"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."

"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."

"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."

"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."

"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."

"Those who record history are those who control history."

"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."

"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."

"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"

"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."

"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )

[Back to original message]