Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/09/07 03:01

dorayme wrote:
> In article <zsOdnZjDXe0xf5fanZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> dorayme wrote:
>>> In article <WqKdnWcxftV2XpfanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A typical troll - always trying to change the subject when you don't
>>>> have a good response.
>>> You can profile trolls?
>>>
>> There are some things common to almost all trolls - like trying to
>> change the subject when you pin them down.
>
> You claim that it is a necessary (as distinct from a sufficient
> condition)? OK. Let's go along with this for a mo. It still does
> not mean Travis is a troll. There needs to be other conditions
> too. I am sensitive to any one trying to beat Travis up. I am
> possessive about Republicans. If there is a beating to be done of
> them, I am badly wanting the job...
>

That's fine. But if he had an argument, he wouldn't keep trying to
claim someone else's opinion was irrelevant and try to change the subject.

> Anyway, I think you are quite wrong in a fundamental sense. You
> have an unsophisticated view of trolling. My experience is that
> the prima facie non-troll folk do the subject changing after the
> initial (admittedly trollish) change in the thread. Let me
> perfectly blunt: in a troll's sub-branch, I have detected as much
> subject changing initiatives among the non trolls as among the
> trolls.
>

Quite frankly, I don't give a damn. I have challenged him repeatedly to
come up with some facts. He refuses and tries to change the subject.
That is troll behavior. Plain and simple.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]