|
Posted by SpaceGirl on 10/09/07 06:53
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> SpaceGirl wrote:
>> Travis Newbury wrote:
>
>>> What it's not good for:
>>> Complete websites
>>> text based information site (like, but not limited to sites like
>>> google)
>>> menus/navigation
>>
>> I disagree, and this is exactly what I was arguing. Flash COULD be
>> used for ANY of those... it depends on context - meaning the audience,
>> the
>> content etc...
>>
>
> And that's where I strongly disagree. That's when a website gets really
> frustrating really fast.
>
Only because you don't understand the technology though. Flash doesn't
need to be fancy. Sometimes it can offer something small and more
efficient than HTML+CSS. While generally I'd agree that there are some
things you shouldn't really try have Flash do, completely writing it off
is terribly short sighted unless you are a secret Flash genius and know
without a doubt "it won't work". Flash is -so- powerful these days, you
can create practically anything in it (you could, for example, write
your own web browser INSIDE Flash if you wanted); I know as a Flash
person I'm not smart enough to say exactly where Flash's boundaries lay.
--
x theSpaceGirl (miranda)
http://www.northleithmill.com
-.-
Kammy has a new home: http://www.bitesizedjapan.com
[Back to original message]
|