|  | Posted by Brendan Gillatt on 10/09/07 15:13 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1
 
 Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
 > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:53:39 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
 > <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
 >
 >> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
 >> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
 >>
 >>>> *snicker*
 >>>>
 >>>> You retard!  That won't even work on IE 5 on teh Mac!
 >>> And how does that have a higher percentage of users than those which
 >>> cannot use flash?
 >> Um, retard, Flash works just peachy on IE 5 on teh Mac...maybe not
 >> Flash 9, but you can go as low as Flash 4...actually maybe even lower,
 >> but I haven't personally tested it so I won't say for certain.  Unlike
 >> you, I don't run the fuck at the mouth about shit I don't know about.
 >>
 >> Since the percentage of IE5 Mac users who can view your rendition
 >> is...ZERO...obviously the Flash method is superior.  Again though, yer
 >> not so good with the numbers, what with how you think users are
 >> somehow magically spacing their access apart on yer server to achieve
 >> a nice median hit rate.
 >>
 >>>> Not to mention:
 >>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/URAMORON.swf
 >>>>
 >>>> LOL, you can achieve the same effect in Flash with NO HTML or CSS code
 >>>> and it's ONLY 280 bytes...that's a nearly FORTY PERCENT reduction in
 >>>> size from yer idiot bloat code!
 >>> So, sorry - I did leave the code un-optimised. By changing the names to
 >>> single characters and removing whitespace I'd probalby get close
 >> This is the part where you won't actually do it because you know
 >> you're full of shit.  Removing all the white space in "your" code (and
 >> by "your" I mean the guy you ripped it off of) wouldn't really have
 >> any significant impact at all on the overall size.
 >
 > Just to prove how stupid you are, I went ahead and removed all the
 > white space from "your" code.  I also removed just about every
 > possible bit of extraneous code and this is the best that can be
 > achieved:
 > http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/protal.html
 >
 > 654 Bytes, still about twice the size of mine
 
 With probably at least 200 times more operating systems/browsers that
 can view the text in a readable way.
 
 - --
 Brendan Gillatt
 brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
 http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
 PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBACD7433
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
 
 iD8DBQFHC5qqkA9dCbrNdDMRAjEHAJ9SuE/oXmUEcgQE8erpUTzR7nl1pACfd8b9
 gTbp4ehUiW2ME/lWefKJUgY=
 =96AN
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 [Back to original message] |