|
Posted by Steve on 10/09/07 14:19
"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:0ipmg31nlu5cdbbvavrgad5ub04kai8mk8@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:30:18 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>>news:jt1lg396pru74b0jh2affmrt5dut9vk3tr@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
> You're still a r-tard, Stupid. For all you know all those hits
> happened in the same hour on the same day and the rest of the time it
> got zero hits...yer kinda fuckwitted and stupid like that, huh?
oh no, no...i can say with statistical certainty of 98% that if 500K hits is
all you get per month, they will NOT be happening all at once...even within
the same hour.
> Keep making ASSumptions and retarded, nonsensical, non-real world
> equations to try and justify your idiocy...it's amusing if nothing
> else.
assumption == inference == how human beings learn.
as you are less than human, i can understand that you sheeple rhetoric like
'ass'umption...without critically analysing that 'conventional wisdom' for
what it is...a bad play on words.
i know you have your associates and everything, but when you decide to go to
big boi school, you'll run across a class called 'statistics' and hopefully
another called 'quantitative business management models'. then, hopefully,
you'll come to grips which how people quantify and qualify money making
decisions. predicting net traffic is a function of business and no matter
what front-end you put out there, your site will fail if you cannot predict
your traffic.
lucky you...you don't get traffic, so, you don't have to worry.
[Back to original message]
|