Posted by asdf on 10/10/07 04:56

"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:IpednYDbPN6Y2JHanZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@comcast.com...
> asdf wrote:
>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>> [snip boring drivel]
>>
>> God (or your supreme being of choice) help you if you use the same kind
>> of language with your clients/employer that you use here, matey boy. I
>> for one had no difficulty in understanding the term 'sub work'. Hmm...
>> 'people in glass houses'?
>>
>
> No, I just use it with OMH. It's the only language he understands.
>
>> In the business world, *of course* you would use the term 'outsourcing'.
>> I am thankful though, that our language is not (yet) wholly defined by
>> what we can find in Google, or in the business world.
>>
>
> <snip drivel>
>
> Nope, in the business world I use the term "sub" also. My customers know
> what a sub is, and what outsourcing is. And they know the difference.


I'm AGREEING with you... LMGDAO... it's irony... you know... irony. Perhaps
if you'd read the drivel you would have understood this :)))))))

[Back to original message]