Posted by asdf on 10/10/07 13:01

"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:oq6pg3l0cdl4tum6fjkef43oi5pvmsjgoj@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:56:12 +1000, "asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>news:IpednYDbPN6Y2JHanZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> asdf wrote:
>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>> message
>>>> [snip boring drivel]
>>>>
>>>> God (or your supreme being of choice) help you if you use the same kind
>>>> of language with your clients/employer that you use here, matey boy. I
>>>> for one had no difficulty in understanding the term 'sub work'. Hmm...
>>>> 'people in glass houses'?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, I just use it with OMH. It's the only language he understands.
>>>
>>>> In the business world, *of course* you would use the term
>>>> 'outsourcing'.
>>>> I am thankful though, that our language is not (yet) wholly defined by
>>>> what we can find in Google, or in the business world.
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip drivel>
>>>
>>> Nope, in the business world I use the term "sub" also. My customers
>>> know
>>> what a sub is, and what outsourcing is. And they know the difference.
>>
>>
>>I'm AGREEING with you... LMGDAO... it's irony... you know... irony.
>>Perhaps
>>if you'd read the drivel you would have understood this :)))))))
>
> You're confusing Jerry with someone who has enough sense not to let
> something like this happen:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Jerry+Stuckle&btnG=Google+Search
>
> ...yeah.
>
[snip boring shite for the second time]

Yes, but at least he's not a juvenile or emotionally retarded as you.

[Back to original message]