Posted by asdf on 10/10/07 13:06

"asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote in message
news:470ccd45$0$23839$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
> news:oq6pg3l0cdl4tum6fjkef43oi5pvmsjgoj@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:56:12 +1000, "asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>news:IpednYDbPN6Y2JHanZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> asdf wrote:
>>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> [snip boring drivel]
>>>>>
>>>>> God (or your supreme being of choice) help you if you use the same
>>>>> kind
>>>>> of language with your clients/employer that you use here, matey boy. I
>>>>> for one had no difficulty in understanding the term 'sub work'. Hmm...
>>>>> 'people in glass houses'?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, I just use it with OMH. It's the only language he understands.
>>>>
>>>>> In the business world, *of course* you would use the term
>>>>> 'outsourcing'.
>>>>> I am thankful though, that our language is not (yet) wholly defined by
>>>>> what we can find in Google, or in the business world.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip drivel>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, in the business world I use the term "sub" also. My customers
>>>> know
>>>> what a sub is, and what outsourcing is. And they know the difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm AGREEING with you... LMGDAO... it's irony... you know... irony.
>>>Perhaps
>>>if you'd read the drivel you would have understood this :)))))))
>>
>> You're confusing Jerry with someone who has enough sense not to let
>> something like this happen:
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Jerry+Stuckle&btnG=Google+Search
>>
>> ...yeah.
>>
> [snip boring shite for the second time]
>
> Yes, but at least he's not a juvenile or emotionally retarded as you.
>

PS. It's fun playing with the guppies in a pool full of sharks.

[Back to original message]