|
Posted by Brendan Gillatt on 10/10/07 21:06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:54:11 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> Sorry Dribbles, but there aren't that many Lynx users on the planet.
>>> Try like .000000015723 times more OS/browser combos.
>
>> So using your math you say that there are roughly 1 billion times as many
>> browsers that support flash than those that don't? I didn't even know
>> there were that many browsers out there.
>
> Well since 2004 there have been around 300 million Firefox browser
> downloads alone, so yeah, overall there's probably around a billion
> web browsers that have been installed at one point or another.
>
> You're kinda stupid, so you obviously didn't think I was talking about
> individual copies of the browsers. Perhaps next time you won't make
> such a dribbling mistake.
Or present your ideas in a more readable fashion. Say, you've given up
shouting. Perhaps you aren't as malevolent as you make yourself out to be.
>>> Essentially what your stupid ass is trying to argue is that Pepsi
>>> should fill their cans with tap water instead of cola so they can
>>> produce more for more people.
>
>> Sorry, what? Why would pepsi want to fill their cans with tap water?
>> Sounds a bit pointless to me considering they make a cola flavoured
>> drink. Might confuse the consumers a bit ;]
>
> Sorry, what? Why would someone want to fill their website with
> nothing but plain black text on a white background?
So that people can read it.
So that people can choose how to read it.
So that people can bookmark pages on it.
So that it has maximum accessibility.
So that every single browser ever invented can read it.
So I can develop without a propriety IDE and format.
So that I can share and organise the information in a flexible way such
as XML.
> Sounds a bit
> pointless to me considering they make so many advanced, graphic rich
> design tools and languages like Flash. `, )
Which are not designed for main page content...
>>> BTW, yer ass seems to be a lil red there, what's the matter, all sore
>>> about getting yer ass blistered over all those Flash file size
>>> ASSumptions you made?
>
>> No not at all. Still blistered that I de-compiled your code to your utter
>> dis-belief?
>
> If you actually decompiled it you would have been able to describe how
> it actually worked, instead you fumbled out some nonsense and then you
> claimed you could magically sandwich together multiple images into one
> single savable image using nothing but HTML and CSS...a feat that
> we're all still eagerly awaiting to see you pull off, Dipshit.
Did I or did I not post a portion of your original ActionScript? I would
be happy to e-mail you a .fla file if you wish.
>>> Hopefully you'll learn something from your
>>> spanking...although yer kind of an angsty little prepub muppet fuck
>>> from the Barney generation, so maybe not.
>
>> I don't understand you calling me angry. You seem to use a fair few more
>> vulgar words than I.
>
> My words are meant to describe you in the most accurate way possible,
> not to convey or show any directed emotion. If you see my posts as
> "angry", really that's just a reflection of the way you feel about
> yourself when I point out all your personal failings.
Assumed on what grounds?
>>> Hell yer generation is so
>>> fuckin stupid they actually had to invent TWO larger "baby" diaper
>>> sizes just because the lot of you crack babies couldn't manage to
>>> potty train by the age of six.
>
>> I'm sure those were for fatties like yourself.
>
> This from the dipshit who didn't potty train until age six.
Your proof being?
You see oni, you don't argue on usenet really, you simply contradict.
This is why you're boring me now. You have run out of points to make and
instead turn to insults. That's generally what thugs do when challenged.
- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHDT64kA9dCbrNdDMRAkYmAJ9gYiEX6N7Y3OmNksZ77prcX+9+4wCfZv2o
K1c0dTWkH0JLFe2aOVu40iU=
=fdd0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Back to original message]
|