Posted by dorayme on 10/13/07 03:42

In article <cLGdnaw9Xp4wr43anZ2dnUVZ_oLinZ2d@comcast.com>,
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <UPCdnc5O65dys43anZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> > Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> I'm not advocating anything here - just want to alleviate my ignorance...
> >>> What's bad about your site being framed in someone else's site? Wouldn't
> >>> that increase your site's exposure? I understand that the other site
> >>> could
> >>> be making some financial gain from using your site that way, but how does
> >>> that hurt you instead of help you?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> You mean using YOUR bandwidth to give someone else credit for YOUR
> >> content is good?
> >
> > Credit, schmredit, not everyone looks after number one as the
> > highest priority.
> >
>
> No problem. You want to pay my hosting bill for the next year? I won't
> even give you credit for it.

OK, send me details, your credit card number, password etc... I
need these to deal with your creditors... Send email with subject
"My Credit Card for philanthropic Troll" so I look out for it.

I suppose it is not quite btw to point out that you have
committed the Aristotelian reasoning mistake that is translated
into English a little clumsily as "Generalising one bad
consequence in order to undermine and distract attention from the
initial criticism".

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]