Posted by Wings on 10/13/07 18:44
"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:doraymeRidThis-20B280.12473313102007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <UPCdnc5O65dys43anZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> > I'm not advocating anything here - just want to alleviate my
>> > ignorance...
>> > What's bad about your site being framed in someone else's site?
>> > Wouldn't
>> > that increase your site's exposure? I understand that the other site
>> > could
>> > be making some financial gain from using your site that way, but how
>> > does
>> > that hurt you instead of help you?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> You mean using YOUR bandwidth to give someone else credit for YOUR
>> content is good?
>
But near as I can see the same bandwidth is being used whether one is
looking at your site in a frame on someone else's site as is used if they
are at your site directly. I'm still missing something here...
[Back to original message]
|