|
|
Posted by bbxrider on 10/16/07 01:39
thanks very much for your quick replies, now i validate
as far as transitional, i thought it gave more latitude in coding
but if there is good reason not to use it i won't
is there a quick explanation or a link you can suggest so i can understand
it
better or in my case just understand it :-)
thanks again
bob
"Jim Moe" <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN@sohnen-moe.com> wrote in message
news:3radnbokX9qHnYnanZ2dnUVZ_tLinZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 10/15/07 04:59 pm, bbxrider wrote:
>>
>> here is the page start,
>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
>>
>> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
>> <html>
>> <link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
>> <head>
>> <title>stockton beautiful house for sale, lincoln schools 3/2, all new
>> kitchen, bath, floors, windows</title>
>> </head>
>>
> The <meta...> and <link...> must be in the <head> section.
> Why are you using Transitional?
>
> --
> jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
> (Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
[Back to original message]
|