|
|
Posted by Steve on 10/16/07 16:39
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:NZqdncE6nNtVLInanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:i7adnV5K8dHWvonanZ2dnUVZ_urinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:kqednQyGiYzxa47anZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> bb90125@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 14, 11:11 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> bb90...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> I read below a claim that Jerry Stuckle is a registered sex
>>>>>>>> offender,
>>>>>>>> and that he molested someone. If this is true, doesn't this make
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> want to just punch him right in the face?
>>>>>>>> I hate people who molest or harm children.
>>>>>>> ROFLMAO, danielcarringt...@gmail.com!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're even more stoopid than most trolls!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe we outta take up a collection to pay OMH's plane fair down to
>>>>>>> Florida. The two of you should get along quite well together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both of you have your heads up your asses!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>> Remove the "x" from my email address
>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>> JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>>>>>> jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>> Shut your mouth, sir.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO! Hit a sore spot, did I?
>>>> this is getting lame, jerry. don't these idiots have anything better to
>>>> do? i suppose that's a rhetorical question though.
>>> No, they don't, Steve. Can't you see that? Their only life is on
>>> usenet. They have no personal contact with people - people don't want to
>>> be around them.
>>
>> i suppose small minds require even less stimuli to warrant entertainment.
>>
>> cheers.
>
> Yea, it really makes me wonder what their lives are like.
non-existent. ;^)
> I mean, we know Matthew hasn't had a date in over 10 years. And this
> "Daniel Carrington" (one of these days when I have some time I'll track
> down his real name) probably isn't any better.
to what end though? flaming is sufficient.
> But after his employer finds the stuff he's been posting on usenet he'll
> probably be out of a job. And he'll blame me for that, also.
do you know of any employers who 1) google their employees, and 2) take into
consideration what is being done on said employee's personal time? i don't
work there and am not sure he does either.
> These buys never learn, and they never take responsibility for their own
> actions.
omh posting slanderous material on the net is certainly grounds for
prosecution and will get him a nice fine. i was suprised you didn't pursue
that. a good joke would be to create a pseudo-summons and mail it to his
house. ;^)
as for the others posting here...i consider it all fun and games.
[Back to original message]
|