Posted by rf on 10/19/07 09:29

"Tim Streater" <tim.streater@dante.org.uk> wrote in message
news:tim.streater-C2CCC3.10070419102007@news.individual.net...
> In article <yc_Ri.1733$CN4.1478@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> "rf" <rf@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> "Tim Streater" <timstreater@waitrose.com> wrote in message
>> news:timstreater-650DBE.08521219102007@individual.net...
>> > In article <IMudnbZMmfQWyoXanZ2dnUVZ_tninZ2d@midco.net>,
>> > Sean Fritz <administrator@vaxius.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> Frames are dead.
>> >
>> > This, on the other hand, is rubbish.
>>
>> Care to cite any modern (that is, this century) source that advocates the
>> use of frames? And I mean a proper source, not some web dreziners blog.
>
> It's the blanket statement that is rubbish. Frames (and iframes) are
> working just fine for my application (for a closed community of
> engineers).

How many engineers? 20? Out of say 2,000,000,000 internet users?

--
Richard.

[Back to original message]