Posted by The Natural Philosopher on 10/22/07 01:13

Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:HZqdnWi_EtW0DobanZ2dnUVZ_vfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>>>> Nope. Security by obscurity is no security at all.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, indeed it is.
>>> Not at all. It is false security.
>>
>> The only total security is to unplug the damned thing.
>> Everything else either works, or it doesn't.
>> If obscurity keeps the bad guys away - it's REAL security.
>>
>
> But obscurity doesn't keep bad guys away. That's the false assumption.
>
>> It's painfully common for Republican folks like Jerry here to tell
>> people who are perfectly safe that they are not.
>>
>
> I'm telling people obscurity is NOT safe.
>
> You're telling them that obscurity IS safe.
>
> Who's telling people they are perfectly safe when they're not, Sanders?
>
>
>
I'm telling you nothing is safe. So make sure that nothing is what they
fie when they go lookinmg.

A door with a big fuckoff lock on it is an inviation to have a crack..

If you were a secret intelligence agency, where would you put your
headquarters - in the biggest skyscraper in new york? or above Mr Ho's
chinese laundry in Des Moines?

I know where I would put it.

[Back to original message]