Posted by William Gill on 10/22/07 17:17

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>
> It depends. CSS 3 is largely stagnated or apparently futile (designing
> features that won't be implemented in browsers), so "progress" isn't
> really descriptive of the status. But if you think that CSS needs to be
> extended, the CSS 3 work is probably your last, best hope.
>

I wasn't aware of the specifics, but I got the impression from your
first response that "progress" or "optimistic" were a stretch. "largely
stagnated", "apparently futile", "won't be implemented in browsers" just
reaffirm that impression. It must just be my mood, but I got a chuckle
from your comment, and thought that was your intent.

Seriously though, what do you think the alternative will be, if this is
the "last, best hope?"

[Back to original message]