Posted by Jukka K. Korpela on 10/23/07 10:27

Scripsit Sonnich Jensen:

[a fullquote, the usual way of indicating lack of comprehensive readins ]

> Thank you that explains it.

Which "that" explains "it"? (Please don't answer. This was a rhetoric
question.)

> The solution is is ok,

It depends on what the problem really is. It wasn't explained, so I decided
to answer just the question that was asked.

> but requieres nested tables to have the same.

Same what? What should have the same what and why? And why would you need
nested tables? Any "solution" that requires nested tables is a non-solution,
often to a non-problem.

> Other ideas still welcome.

How about telling the real problem, demonstrating it with a URL, and using
consistently your real name, if you were the original poster?

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Back to original message]