Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/26/07 03:35

Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Sanders Kaufman)
>
>> "Michael Fesser" <netizen@gmx.de> wrote
>>> .oO(Sanders Kaufman)
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> But this belongs to a well-known troll. I wouldn't be surprised at the
>>>>> number of posts. In fact, in a way I'm surprised it isn't higher. And
>>>>> some of your hits are people talking about it.
>>>> I gotta agree with Jerry on this one.
>>> So you can prove that "posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0"
>>> belongs to this person? Try it.
>> No - looking at the message body is what confirms that it's the same poster.
>
> Just because two people ask the same question? There's no particular
> wording or "l33t" speak to indicate that both came from the same person.
> Maybe you want to elaborate on that?
>
> The postings also came from different networks. Of course that's no
> proof, but there's also absolutely no evidence that both posters were
> the same. Until now all you've got (if any) are some very weak hints.
>
> And then there's also the comment from Jerry, that "this" (with regard
> to the posting-account ID) belongs to a well-known troll - two wrong
> claims in just one sentence:
>
> 1) The posting-account ID doesn't belong to any poster at all.
> 2) "Well-known" indicates that this guy has already been seen earlier
> and regularly, but there's no evidence of that either.
>
> So, even if this should happen to be the same person - until now both
> you and Jerry failed to prove your points. Currently it's just hot air,
> nothing more.
>
> Micha
>

No, Micha, it's you who are full of hot air.

And you know everything, so I'm not going to bother to educate you on
the intricacies of reading headers. It's too easy to do.

And BTW - I said "well known troll". I did not say "well known in
comp.lang.php".

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]