Posted by Wyngs on 11/02/07 05:02

dorayme wrote:

> In article <13il7vhcjg9dvff@corp.supernews.com>,
> Wyngs <glenn61@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > dorayme wrote:
> >
> > > In article <13ikpfaqq27cu57@corp.supernews.com>,
> > > Wyngs <glenn61@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I
> > > > can't remember anything that said you were pretty half of humanity
> > >
> > > Modesty prevents me from saying anything about how pretty I am.
> > > And, you are not to know and I do not blame you, your assumption
> > > about the percentage is a tricky one. Is a non-human, for
> > > example, a frog, a percentage of humanity (albeit zero) or not?
> > > <g>
> > >
> > >
> > Well, a frog has twice as many chromosomes as a human - so who knows?
> > But I guess I'm destined not to know. In any case, I will always mind my
> > manners - just in case. (grin)
> >
>
> er... actually, I have no chromosomes, its not like that with me,
> there is nothing wet about me... but seeing as you are so nice
> like, I think you will find some good, probably *the best*, info
> on z indexing at
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-z-index
>
>
Thanks again. Time to quit hogging newsgroup space and go off and learn
something. Later...



> > ****
> > Still haven't found diddly about z layers - not even at W3C. What I did
> > find was just a lot of references to it. However, I've only spent a few
> > minutes looking, so far. (I know it's out there or you people wouldn't
> > be using it). Heh.
>
>

[Back to original message]