Posted by Adrienne Boswell on 11/03/07 22:33

Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jonathan N. Little"
<lws4art@centralva.net> writing in news:7b1b4$472c9f47$40cba7c4$21950
@NAXS.COM:

> mic123@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
>>> This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
>>> websites.
>>> Separate layout from content.
>>>
>>> There's no reason to use tables any more.
>>> Everything can be done with CSS.
>>> Tables are so 2002ish ...
>>>
>>> Do you agree with that?
>>> I don't.
>>> I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
>>> desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
>>> But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS
....
>>
>> Tables are the easiest
>> If you need something simple use tables
>>
>
> See if you feel that way after editing a site with a half dozen nested
> tables with row and column spans...
>

Yes, without going into the HTML, and having the server write a lot of
javascript href="javascript('somethingbad')"

I inherited that nightmare a few years ago, all gone now.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share

[Back to original message]