|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 10/06/74 11:22
"JDS" <jeffrey@example.invalid> skrev i meddelandet
news:pan.2005.07.25.16.54.51.561583@example.invalid...
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:52:21 +0000, Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> > I think that you should respect other people΄s opinions and freedom.
> > You should not tell others what they should do.
>
> Sure I should. In fact, aren't *you* doing that right now?
No, I do not think so. I told you that you could go on learning one thing
at
a time if you wish
but I want to learn several things at the same time and it is my right to
do so, if I want to.
See below.
> > As to me, I do not like learning things one at a time. You may learn
them
> > one at a time, if you prefer.
>
> That may be true, but you are not demonstrating that you are, in fact,
> learning anything. Leastways, your *questions* don't demonstrate that
> you've learned anything.
1) Why should I and how could I demonstrate something to you?
Well, you might read my posts to get an idea of a little part of what I know
but you will need know many
languages in this case and these posts have not been written in all the
languages I know and languages are only a part of what I know.
http://groups.google.se/groups?q=Luigi+Donatello+Asero&start=0&scoring=d&hl=sv&
I know what I am learning and what I have learnt more than you (or other
people)
do. ( I did not question what you knew, or what you were learning, in
fact!)
While writing to you I am doing something else at the same time.
> > Also, I think that people learn as long as they live.
>
> Well, I can't fault you for that philosophy. People *ought* to maintain
> that attitude.
Again, it is their choice to believe that they will go on learning or not,
though.
> > It is just an illusion to assume that one has learnt everything about a
> > certain subject.
>
> I never make that assumption. (well, "never" being what it is and all,
> let's just say I try not to make that assumption).
If you say that one should learn one thing at at time you seem to
imply either that
you should learn only one thing iin your own life or that you will know
everything about an issue and later you will go on with the next subject
which implies that you will have finished learning on the first subject.
The result of this is often that you
begin forgetting about the first issue
"Repetita iuvant".
And if you agree that "Repetita iuvant".
you can never finishing learning about one issue which means that either you
should learn only on one subject in your own life,
(which would be virtually impossible, anyway) or that you will be learning
several things at a time.
(And if you try to interpret simultaneously, you will do several things at
the same time, in any case)
--
Luigi Donatello (un italiano che vive in Svezia)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/lagenhet-i-italien3.php
[Back to original message]
|