Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/05/07 19:00

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:06:04 +1030, Michael
<michael_j@pythontech.net.au> wrote:

>> AJAX is just a techno buzz word, it doesn't really have any meaning in
>> most conversations (when being used by wannabes and poser class
>> dipshits). It's basically a site that relies heavily on javascript,
>> XML and CSS and is often dynamic in nature.

>AJAX is not a techno 'buzz' word.

You really are living in a bubble of stupidity, aren't you?

>It is an acronym that stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML.

When you capitalize javascript...it makes you look stupid, just so you
know. And just because it's an acronym that stands for something
doesn't the fuck mean that 90%+ of the retards throwing the word
around know fuck all about it, other than it sounds "new" and "edgy"
and "the other guys have it".

>I would say it is ALWAYS dynamic in
>nature, as AJAX would not make sense on a static site.

Technically speaking the acronym itself doesn't make much sense
period.

>An AJAX site does not need to rely heavily on CSS at all.

Um, it sort of helps you goober. Let's see, list all the AJAX type
sites that you know of that DON'T have any CSS! DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM

>How ever Web
>Developers may choose to assign CSS classes by Javascript,

And now you're referring to it as "Javascript"...*sigh*...sign of a
clueless fuckin newbie.

>to achieve a
>combination of transition effects, or UI feedback. For example,
>highlighting invalid content in a field.

You could do it without CSS, that's not the point, the point is that
with CSS it's EASIER, hence the reason why it's pretty much ALWAYS
used...unless you're just some monumental dumbfuck.

>> The concept of AJAX was actually ripped off and dumbed down from
>> existing concepts, like my "living site" designs (aka God level
>> coding). Basically the intent is to make a site that acts like a
>> living creature and will react and change depending on user
>> interaction. So if you say click on a link it will change the
>> existing content within itself, rather than taking you to a different
>> page.

>Your an idiot.

You really shouldn't call other people idiots when you can't even
figure out the difference between "your" and "you're" you fuckin
idiot.

>Living Creature?

Think slow now, don't hurt yourself.

>No one ripped you off, no one ripped
>anyone off, it has been around for sometime, and is just a term for a
>general way of doing something.

Look here you n00b ass fuck job, in case it just skipped yer idiot ass
the gawd damn Internet has been around for a fuck of a lot longer than
yer dumbass has been online (according to Google you just started
posting like...last month. And yes, you drooler, dynamic sites
existed way, way, WAY the fuck before AJAX was ever coined and pimped
out to college flunkie retards like yourself.

>BTW, Microsoft invented the
>XMLHttpRequest and used it for Outlook Web Access. This is 7 and a bit
>years ago. Considering your site was registered 21 May 2003, I fail to
>see how you came up with this first.

My domain was registered in 2003 you fuck job, a look into my Google
history spans back to around 1995 and there are no shortage of
websites I made PRIOR to having my own domain (most notably when my
sites were hosted via petitmorte). Further, you dipshit, you DON'T
need to use XML in order to make a dynamic site (you obviously missed
that point in my last post).

>Also, I fail to see how you were planning to do all of this without
>Microsoft inventing the technology and Netscape expanding it, and other
>browsers incorporating it.

The fact that you DON'T NEED XML TO MAKE A DYNAMIC SITE! Yeesh, write
it the fuck down if yer having so much trouble you idiot fuck. That
was the whole gawd damn shitting POINT of my last post, that AJAX
dumbed the fuckin concept down and restricted it to XML when in fact
you don't need ANY XML to make a dynamic site.

>> As I said though, that concept was stolen (and not just from me) and
>> then dumbed down to specific languages/forms. The concept was NEVER
>> intended to be exclusive to any specific language forms, although most
>> early sites in that form used a lot of javascript/CSS/XML. At this
>> point, most developers who actually know what the hell it is they're
>> doing are using a combination of Flash/CSS/XML and PHP to construct
>> their sites.

>I repeat, your an idiot, your Flash sites are HORRIBLE.

As fuckin stupid as you are it obviously skipped you that there's a
whole lot more to my sites than Flash. Most of my newer sites are a
combination of Flash, CSS, XML, javascript, vbscript, PHP, etc. Also,
it's cute to see you run the fuck at the mouth about *MY* sites when:

A. you can't even sum up enough intelligence to explain WHAT you
supposedly think is horrible about my sites.

and...

B. you're a stupid college flunkie retard who doesn't even HAVE any
sites of yer own to provide as a basis of comparison. Face it
d00d...yer just some fuckin wannabe, poser class dipshit. You run at
the mouth real good, but you ain't got shit to back it up with.

>> The other problem with AJAX, is that beyond the fact that it's a
>> ripped off and watered down concept, it has become a techno-babble
>> buzz word, meaning it's often abused and misused by the clueless and
>> poser class wannabes of the world. I would estimate that a good 90%+
>> of all the people throwing that word around have absolutely no fuckin
>> clue at all as to what it even pertains to.

>It's easy to determine if something is AJAX or not. I would estimate any
>project that claims to use AJAX most likely DOES use AJAX, or
>Asynchronous Javascript, or a very similar method.

The idiot fuck high school dropout whose obviously never worked a day
in the business is trying to make "estimates"...oh that's cute,
really. The best way of ACTUALLY determining if a person knows what
AJAX means is to find a job listing where it says they're looking for
someone "who knows AJAX", then just go to the interview. It won't
take too long to poke at them in the right places to see if they even
understand the position that they're hiring for (very often they
don't).

> However, I'd say you
>are definitely in the 90% of people who don't know what they are talking
>about. You are the biggest troll in this group. Maybe your thinking Web 2.0?

You are without a doubt the biggest retard in this group. Let us all
know when you figure out the difference between "your" and "you're"
you drooling child.

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog


Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."

"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."

"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."

"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."

"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"

"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."

"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."

"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."

"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"

"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."

"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."

"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."

"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."

"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."

"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."

"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."

"Those who record history are those who control history."

"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."

"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."

"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"

"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."

"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )

[Back to original message]