Posted by WebmasterSanta on 11/06/07 07:41

On Nov 3, 10:49 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> mic...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
> > > This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
> > > websites.
> > > Separate layout from content.
>
> > > There's no reason to use tables any more.
> > > Everything can be done with CSS.
> > > Tables are so 2002ish ...
>
> > > Do you agree with that?
> > > I don't.
> > > I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
> > > desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
> > > But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
>
> > Tables are the easiest
> > If you need something simple use tables
>
> That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
> As an example check out this template I made.http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/temp/template.html
> --
> Regards Chad.http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sorry your 2 examples look clunky. You need to go back to tables. CSS
is a lot of hype. We need to start telling the yahoooos what our
compliants are not what they what it to be.

[Back to original message]