Posted by Chaddy2222 on 11/06/07 16:35

On Nov 7, 3:21 am, Bone Ur <monstersquas...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:25:47
> GMT Chaddy2222 scribed:
>
> >> Maybe so.
> >> But I doubt it can rightly be defined as accessible content.
> > Neather is audio for a particular part of the disability community,
> > but the deff don't need descriptions of live audio content.
> > The slide show is visual.
> > You can't really be done any other way.
>
> Eh? If an image "should be" accessible content, why should a sequence of
> images not be? Furthermore, I made a great slideshow in javascript, which,
> of course, is not perfectly accessible, either.
>
Well they could be, but the portfolio is a purely presssontational
thing.
BTW it also saves on HTTP requests as the images are all in the SWF
file.
--
Regards Chad.

[Back to original message]