Posted by Travis Newbury on 11/06/07 20:47

On Nov 6, 3:34 pm, "André Gillibert"
<tabkanDELETETHIS...@yahodeletethato.fr> wrote:
> I think you mean: There're no technology whose all usages are wrong.
> If you mean: Any web developing style is ok, then, I disagree.

Nope, I mean I think you should be able to design your website anyway
you want. Obviously some choices will result in few revisiting your
site, but that does not mean it is wrong. Only stupid.

> Inaccessible, invalid, fixed-layout, flashy sites, with huge (e.g. 1MiB
> pages for 2 KiB of data) pages, obfuscated (for "security" reasons) and
> 90% of the visible area overriden by invasive off-topic ads and using only
> the SPAN and A HTML elements (because CSS can almost give any layout from
> any page), full of JavaScript links (with href="#"), with a single URI for
> the whole website (using POST data or AJAX to identify the location), with
> no site map, without any structure of the pages or the content of the
> pages, have probably been developed the "wrong" way.

Why? It may be dumb, but not wrong.

> Simple example of wrong creation way for web sites: Using monkeys as web
> developers.

Again, why? Stupid yes. Wrong? Not hardly

[Back to original message]